Works Cited

Note: If URL does not automatically take you to the source listed, please copy and paste the URL into a browser. It should work that way.

AACU. (n.d.) VALUE Rubrics. https://www.aacu.org/value-rubrics. Accessed, January 8, 2020.

ACPA. The Student Learning Imperative. https://myacpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ACPAs-Student-Learning-Imperative.pdf. Accessed March 14, 2024.

ACPA/NASPA. (n.d.). Professional competency areas for student affairs educators. https://www.naspa.org/book/professional-competency-areas-for-student-affairs-educators/. Accessed August 17, 2023.

APA. Definition of terms. https://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/sexuality-definitions.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2016.

Arum, R. & Roksa, J. (2010). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Alkin, M. (2011). Evaluation essentials. New York: Guilford.

American Association of Universities (2019). Campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct. https://www.aau.edu/key-issues/campus-climate-and-safety/aau-campus-climate-survey-2019

Astin, A. (1997). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

ASQ. http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/benchmarking/overview/overview.html. Accessed June 30, 2015.

Banta, T. and Baich, C. (2011). Closing the assessment loop. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 43(1), pp. 22-27.

Banta, T., Lund, J., Black, K., & Oblander, F. (1996). Assessment in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Banta, T. W., & Palomba, C. A. (2014). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education. John Wiley & Sons.

Barr, R. & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), pp. 12-26.

Bartlett, T. (2016). Power Poser: When big ideas go bad. The Chronicle of Higher Education, December 4. http://www.chronicle.com/article/When-Big-Ideas-Go-Bad/238544.

Bennett, M. & Brady J. A Radical Critique of the Learning Outcomes Assessment Movement. Radical Teacher, 100, Fall (2014). https://doi.org/10.5195/rt.2014.171.

Berger, P. & Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Boston: Anchor.

Birnbaum, R. 1988. How colleges work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations, 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Basko, A.(2021), Have we gotten student success completely backwards. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 11/29/2021.https://www.chronicle.com/article/have-we-gotten-student-success-completely-backward. Accessed December 26, 2021.

Bresciani, M.J., Zelna, C.L., & Anderson, J.A. (2004). Assessing student learning and development: A handbook for practitioners. Washington, DC: NASPA.

Bresciani, M., Gardner, M. & Hickmott, J. (2009). Demonstrating student success: A practical guide to outcomes-based assessment of learning and development in student affairs. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Bresciani, M.J., Moore Gardner, M., & Hickmott, J. (2009). Case Studies in implementing assessment in student affairs. New Directions for Student Services, 127. Wiley Periodicals.

Bresciani, M.J. (2010) Understanding barriers to student affairs/services professionals’ engagement in outcomes-based assessment of student learning and development. College Student Journal, XIX, pp. 81-89.

Brubacher, J. & Rudy, W. (1976). Higher education in transition, 3rd Ed. New York: Harper & Row.

Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs. (April, 2016). The Benjamin A. Gilman International Scholarship Program: Evaluation Report. U.S. Department of State. https://eca.state.gov/files/bureau/2016.29.04_gilman_evaluation_report.pdf. Accessed June 19, 2016.

Campbell, Corbin M. (2015). Serving a Different Master: Assessing College Educational Quality for the Public. In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 30. Springer International.

CampusLabs. (n.d). How to write learning outcomes.

Center for Inquiry in the Liberal Arts. N.d. http://www.liberalarts.wabash.edu/study-overview/. Accessed July, 2, 2015.

CHEA. The Condition of Accreditation: U.S. Accreditation in 2011  http://www.chea.org/pdf/Condition_US_Accreditation_in_2011.pdf.

The College Score Card. https://collegescorecard.ed.gov.

Common Fund. https://www.commonfund.org/index/hepi-forecast-2023-6#:~:text=Compiled%20from%20data%20reported%20by,and%20general%20expenditures%2C%20excluding%20research.Accessed January 4, 2024.

Council for Higher Education Accreditation. http://www.chea.org/Research/index.asp.

Council for the Advancement of Standards. http://www.cas.edu/standards.

Cox, B., Reason, R., Tobolowsky, R., Brower, R., Patterson, S., Luczyk, S., & Roberts, K. (2017). Lip service or actionable insights? Linking student experiences to institutional assessment and data-driven decision making in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 88(6), pp. 835-862.

Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Creswell, J. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 5th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Creswell, J. & Plano, V. (2007). Mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Crozier, Michael. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1967.

Data Science Central. Statistics how to: Statistics for the rest of us. Propensity score matching: Definition & overview. https://www.statisticshowto.datasciencecentral.com/propensity-score-matching/. Accessed March 11, 2020.

Delisle, J. 2017. The Pell Grant Proxy: A ubiquitous but flawed measure of low-income student enrollment. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-pell-grant-proxy-a-ubiquitous-but-flawed-measure-of-low-income-student-enrollment/

Dictionary.com. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/policy?s=t.

Diver, C. (2022). Breaking ranks: How the rankings industry rules higher education and what to do about it. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Eaton, J. S. (2011). U.S. Accreditation: Meeting the Challenges of Accountability and Student Achievement. Evaluation in Higher Education, 5(1), pp 1-20. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=U.S.+accreditation%3A+Meeting+the+Challenges+of+Accountability&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=. Accessed June 17, 2015.

Eaton, J. S. An overview of U.S. accreditationhttp://www.chea.org/pdf/Overview%20of%20US%20Accreditation%2003.2011.pdf#search=”An%20overview. Accessed June 17, 2015.

Eaton, J.S.  (2013). It’s time to Speak Out: Accreditation, its critics and Its future, accreditation, vol 9 (4), June 27, 2013 http://www.chea.org/ia/IA_2013.06.25.html.  Accessed June 17, 2015.

Erikson, M. G. & Erikson, M. (2018). Learning Outcomes and Critical Thinking–Good Intentions in Conflict. Studies in Higher Education, n.d. Accessed May 15, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1486813.

Fain, P. New rules on accreditation and state authorization. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/11/01/education-department-issues-new-regulations-accreditation-and-state-authorization. Accessed December 25, 2022.

Ftizpatrick, J., Sanders, J. & Worthen, B. (2004) Program evaluation: Alternative approaches, 3rd Ed. Boston: Pearson.

Fraser, M. W & Wu, S. (2016). Measures of consumer satisfaction in social welfare and behavioral research: A systematic review. Research on Social Welfare Practice, 26 (7), pp 762-776.

Gilbert, E. (2015). Does assessment make colleges better? Who knows? The Chronicle of Higher Education, (August). https://www.chronicle.com/article/Does-Assessment-Make-Colleges/232371. Accessed January 6, 2020.

Gilbert, E. (2019). Assessment is an enormous waste of time. Chronicle of Higher Education, https://www.chronicle.com/article/Assessment-Is-an-Enormous/245937. March 20. Accessed January 6, 2020.

Hamilton, L. & Nielsen, K. (2021). Broke: The racial consequences of underfunding public Universities. The Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hazelkorn, E. (2021). In U.S. power in international higher education, J. J. Lee, Ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 42-59.

Henning, G. & Roberts, D. (2016). Student affairs assessment: Theory to practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Henning, G. & Roberts, D. (2024). Student affairs assessment: Theory to practice, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.

Higher Learning Commission. http://www.hlcommission.org/Criteria-Eligibility-and-Candidacy/criteria-and-core-components.html. Accessed June 22, 2015.

Higher Learning Commission. Key findings of the application of the criteria for accreditation,  2023https://download.hlcommission.org/Criteria ForAccreditationData_INF.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2024.

Huba, M. & Freed, J. (1999). Learner centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the Focus from teaching to learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, a Pearson Company.

Hussey, T. & Smith, P. (2003). The uses of learning outcomes. Teaching in higher education, 8 (3), pp. 357–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251032000088574.

Hussey, T. & Smith, P. (2008). Learning outcomes: A conceptual analysis” Teaching in Higher Education, 13 (1), pp. 107–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/135625107017941.59.

Jankowski, N.A., Timmer, J.D., Kinzie, J. & Kuh, G.D. (2018). Assessment that matters: Trending toward practices that document authentic student learning. NILOA.

Joint Committee on Educational Evaluation. The program evaluation standards. http://www.jcsee.org/program-evaluation-standards. Accessed May 27, 2016.

Kamenetz, A. (December 19, 2014).  “New federal ratings will consider aid, total cost and employment.” http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2014/12/19/371705270/details-on-the-administrations-new-college-ratings-system. Accessed June 15, 2015.

Kezar, A., Gehrke, S., & Elrod, S. (2015). Implicit theories of change as a barrier to change on college campuses: An examination of STEM Reform. The Review of Higher Education, 38(4), pp. 479-506.

Knott, K. (2024) Education Dept. Outlines Possible Changes in Accreditation, Distance Education, Other Rules. Inside Higher Education, (January 3, 2024). https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2024/01/03/us-outlines-proposals-alter-accreditation-distance-education?utm_source=Inside+Higher+Ed&utm_campaign=e76d18fa43-DNU_2021_COPY_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1fcbc04421-e76d18fa43-197597929&mc_cid=e76d18fa43&mc_eid=82b4737932. Accessed January 3, 2024.

Knowlton, L., & Phillips, C. (2009). The logic model guidebook. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Krebs, C.P., Lindquist, C.H., Warner, T.D., Fisher, B.S., & Martin, S.L. (2007). The campus sexual assault (CSA) study. Final report to the National Institute of Justice, grant number 2004-WG-BX-0010, document number 221153. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/ pdffiles1/nij/grants/221153.pdf

Lederman, D. Harsh take on assessment…from sssessment pros. Inside Higher Education, April 14, 2019. www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/04/17/advocates-student-learning-assessment-say-its time-different-approach.

Lederman, D. (2019). University of Arizona pursues switch to Western accreditor.  https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2022/12/19/university-arizona-plans-switch-western-accrediting-agency#.Y6BR2zcCfyA.link. Accessed December 25, 2022.

Lien, A.D., Greenleaf, J.P., Lemke, M.K., Hakim, S.M., Swink, N.P., Wright, R., & Meissen, G. (2011). Tearless logic model. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 2(2), pp. 1-12. Retrieved 4/15/2019 from (http://gjcpp.org/).

Lorde, Audre. The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House. 1984. Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Ed. Berkeley, CA: Crossing Press. 110- 114. 2007. Print. https://collectiveliberation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Lorde_The_Masters_Tools.pdf. Accessed December 31, 2023.

Lucas, C. (2006). American higher education: A history, 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

Merriam-Webster. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/policy. Accessed March 17, 2016.

Mertens, D. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Mertler, C. (2019). Introduction to educational research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Middaugh, M. (2010). Planning and assessment in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Mintz, S. & Rutter, P. (October 20, 2016). The curricular and the co-curricular. www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-gamma/curricular-and-co-curricular#

National Survey of Student Engagement. NSSE 2018 Engagement Indicators. http://nsse.indiana.edu/2018_Institutional_Report/pdf/NSSE18%20Engagement%20Indicators%20(NSSEville%20State).pdf. Accessed September 13, 2018.

National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html. Accessed July 17, 2015.

New England Commission on Higher Education. https://www.neche.org/resources/standards-for-accreditation. Accessed January 3, 2022

Owen, J. (2007). Program evaluation, 3rd Ed. New York: Guilford Press.

Paulsen, S. (n.d). Guided by plant voices. An interview with Monica Gagliano. To the Best of Our Knowledge. https://www.ttbook.org/interview/guided-plant-voices. Accessed June 13, 2024.

Payne, S. (1951). The art of asking questions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Pontuso, J. F. & Thornton, S. R. (2008). Is outcomes assessment hurting higher education? Thought & Action, Fall, pp. 61–70.

Porter, Stephen R. Self-Reported learning gains: A theory and test of college student survey response. Research in Higher Education 54, no. 2 (2013): 201–26.

Prevention Innovations Research Center. It’s not just the what but the how. http://www.unh.edu/news/docs/2015/messagingmatters.pdf. Accessed July 21, 2016.

Research Methods Knowledge Base. Inferential statistics. https://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statinf.php. Accessed May 1, 2017.

Rossi, P., Lipsey, M., & Freeman, H. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Rovai, A.P, Baker, J.D. & Ponton, M.K. (2014). Social science research design and statistics: A practitioner’s guide to research methods and IBM SPSS analysis. Watertree Press.

Rubin, H. & Rubin, I. (2012). Qualitative interviewing, 3rd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Salkind, N. & Frey, B. (2020). Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Schuh, J., Biddix, J.P., Dean, L., & Kinzie, J. (2016). Assessment in student affairs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schuh, J. & Upcraft, L. (2001). Assessment practice in student affairs: An applications manual. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley Imprint.

Shireman, Robert. (2016a). The real value of what students do in college. College Completion Series: Part One. Century Foundation, February 25, 2016. https://tcf.org/content/tag/college-completion-series/?agreed=1.

Shireman, Robert. (2016b) SLO madness. Inside Higher Education, April 7, 2016. www.insidehighered.com/views/2016/04/07/essay-how-fixation-inance-student-learning-outcomes-fails-esnure-academic-quality.

Stevens, D. & Levi, A. (2005) Introduction to rubrics. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in American Higher Education (1984). Involvement in learning: Realizing the potential of American Higher Education. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED246833. Accessed July 17, 2015.

Supiano, B. (2016). Early evidence: The College Scorecard made a difference, but only for some groups of students. Chronicle of Higher Education, May 13, 2016. http://chronicle.com/article/Early-Evidence-The-College/236470?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en&elqTrackId=275172c2048a45dfa6a0fe9e54850925&elq=9897758678ad43c9a6194fc7f250a417&elqaid=9042&elqat=1&elqCampaignId=3119. Accessed May 13, 2016.

Suskie, Linda A. (1992). Questionnaire survey research: What works. Association for Institutional Research, Resources for Institutional Research, Number Six.

Suskie, Linda A. (2009). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Suskie, Linda. (2015). Five dimensions of quality: A common sense guide to accreditation and accountability. ProQuest E-book Central: John Wiley & Sons, 2015. ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ku/detail.action?docID=1771349.

Suskie, L. (2018). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide, 3rd ed. Jossey-Bass.

Taylor Jr, L. D. (2020). Neoliberal consequence: Data-driven decision making and the subversion of student success efforts. The Review of Higher Education, 43(4), 1069-1097.

Thelin, J. (2004). A history of American higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Thomsen, J. (June 10, 2015). Talk, then talk again. Inside Higher Education. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/06/10/new-survey-identifies-best-ways-campuses-share-information-sexual-assault-policies. Accessed June 10, 2015.

Trochim, W. (2006) Research Methods Knowledge Base. http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/variable.php. Accessed March 16, 2016.

University of Oregon http://sa-assessment.uoregon.edu/ResourcesandTraining/WritingStudentLearningOutcomes.aspx. Accessed June 10, 2016.

Upcraft, M. L. & Schuh, J. H. (1996). Assessment in student affairs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

US Department of Education. 2011. Meeting President Obama’s college 2020 completion goal. http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/meeting-president-obamas-2020-college-completion-goal. Accessed June 15, 2015.

Voluntary System of Accountability. http://www.voluntarysystem.org. Accessed June 16, 2015.

Walvoord, B. E. (2010). Assessment clear and simple: A practical guide for institutions, departments, and general education. John Wiley & Sons.

Wholey, J. S. (1987). Evaluability assessment: developing program theory. In Using program theory in evaluation, New directions for program evaluation, issue 33, pp. 77-92.

W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Logic model development guide. http://www.smartgivers.org/uploads/logicmodelguidepdf.pdf https://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resource/2006/02/wk-kellogg-foundation-logic-model-development-guide.

Wolf-Wendel, L., Kim, D., & Twombly, S. (2014). Driven by discovery: Satisfaction, motivation, and mobility among foreign-born faculty. Paper presented at AERA, Philadelphia, PA.

Workgroup for Community Health and Development. Community Tool Box, Evaluating community programs and initiatives, Chapter 36, Section 1, A framework for program evaluation.  http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/evaluate/evaluation/framework-for-evaluation/main. Accessed May 26, 2016

Workgroup for Community Health and Development. Community Tool Box, Chapter 3: Developing a plan for assessing local needs and resources. http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/assessing-community-needs-and-resources/develop-a-plan/main. Accessed September 7, 2017.

Workgroup for Community Health and Development. Community Tool Box, Evaluating community programs and initiatives, Chapter 36, Section 5, “Developing an evaluation plan.”http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/evaluate/evaluation/evaluation-plan/main. Accessed June 10, 2016

Worthen, Molly.  (2018). The Misguided Drive to Measure ‘Learning Outcomes. New York Times, February 23, 2018. www.nytimes.com/2018/02/23/opinion/sunday/colleges-measure-learning-outcomes.html. Accessed May 15, 2019.